Hammer and Pickle
3:16 Sun Jan 7
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Actually I’ve been surprised butchers high standard of legal representation, prosecution testimony and judges’ professionalism Trump and his cult members have enjoyed. Of course they are professional victims but I do wish they had something proper to whine about for a change.
|
Nutsin
3:01 Sun Jan 7
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Yeah Cappy because we all know just how fair and unbiased the current DOJ and Democratic Party are.
The constant witch hunt of Trump is obvious and everybody knows it. Same with all these Left wing courts and legislators trying to keep him off the ballot. We all know they are shit scared of him.
These banana republic prosecutors that are all out for Trump arranging court cases in heavily Biased Democratic counties where the Jurors are anti Trump are to be trusted. If it were you they were after you’d do the exact same thing Trump is doing, if not then You’re fucking retard,
|
Capitol Man
4:13 Sun Jan 7
Re: The Epstein Files
|
It’s a charging decision Bovine, it happens in every single indictment. Factors like the indicted person seeking to run for reelection to avoid justice being served can absolutely play into that - there’s also a clear case of national interest and a clear case of Trump being given the opportunity to clear his name before standing for election.
None of this is complicated, but it’s funny watching Bovine roll out the twat world talking points that he really doesn’t understand.
|
Hammer and Pickle
12:51 Sun Jan 7
Re: The Epstein Files
|
You’ll know in due course.
Pip pip, you plonker.
|
riosleftsock
12:45 Sun Jan 7
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Just to be clear, if I understand correctly, this is the 1948 USC 2383 on Insurrection, produced just at the end of WW2?
Why would something like this be 'saved up'? Surely a fan of the rule of law would agree that justice delayed is justice denied?
Are you suggesting this charge is being delayed for political reasons?
|
Hammer and Pickle
11:21 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
It's Criminal Code section 2383.
I think they're saving it up for a special occasion.
|
Dwight Van Mann
11:16 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Has anyone actually been done for insurrection?
|
Hammer and Pickle
11:13 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Who cares what you do spambottroll2
|
riosleftsock
11:07 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Not opening the link until you confirm that there are cases prosecuted and convictions secured for the charge of insurrection?
|
Hammer and Pickle
10:43 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Actually I'm quite impressed with the work being done to charge each individual participant with the exact correct crime or misdemeanour
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/25/1165022885/1000-defendants-january-6-capitol-riot
|
riosleftsock
10:33 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
How many people were charged and convicted of insurrection?
Why has Trump not been charged with inciting an insurrection?
|
Hammer and Pickle
10:25 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
I think he has persuaded some very unhappy, disorientated people that he's their leader, braincell.
|
only1billybonds
10:16 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
How about you explain how he did?
|
Hammer and Pickle
10:05 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
He's going to explain how, according to him, Trump did not incite to insurrection at Capitol Hill three years ago and that, in fact, there was no insurrection at all. In this reality, not just his own fucked up little fantasy.
Do keep up braincell.
|
only1billybonds
10:00 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
"Your verbal reasoning is too shit to even bother talking to you"
Which is another way of saying, 'oh fuck, rios has done me AGAIN'
Give it up Dopey, you clearly aren't as clever as you seem to think.
|
Hammer and Pickle
9:58 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
OK.
So dispute them - what's keeping you?
|
riosleftsock
9:48 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
I read it the first time, it hasn't improved.
You seem to have an emotional response to Trump which blinds your judgment.
Your whole point (apart from voters not being smart enough to be able to decide who they can vote for), is based on 1) there having been an insurrection and 2) Donald Trump was responsible for it.
I dispute both these points and most nonsense you post on here.
|
Hammer and Pickle
9:12 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
OK, I'll post it again
Apart from voters in various states deciding whether they want a rapist like Trump as US president, the Supreme Court is to rule on whether states like Colorado can bar him from running for president. Given he incited his supporters to attempt insurrection at the Capitol Hill riot, I’d say this is an open and shut case in any healthy, robust democracy.
But we know the US has a huge problem with millions of working class voters as described in J.D Vance’s Hillbilly Elegy. Their vulnerable condition is proving to be too much of a temptation for the establishment’s cynical serial power abusers so this Supreme Court ruling is really going to be a key moment. This Maxwell case and the Epstein files being presented in it really are a side show for the main stage event coming up folks.
Maybe someone who can read and can speak Spambottroll can explain it to you.
|
riosleftsock
9:07 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Probably because you don't seem to be able to follow a straight line in a conversation.
I directly responded to your claim regarding his liability for insurrection, asked you a question, you are either unwilling or unable to answer it.
|
Hammer and Pickle
9:04 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
What's the point of corresponding with you if you can't read my posts?
|
riosleftsock
8:58 Sat Jan 6
Re: The Epstein Files
|
Thanks for playing.
I might have to start charging you for this soon.
|
| 
